As mentioned earlier, networked journalists must provide the truth. Sites such as Wikipedia challenge this statement. Anyone, including the infamous Essjay, can go in and change something posted on the website, whether it's true or not. What Beckett argues is that although there is nothing stopping someone from providing false information, there is also nothing stopping people from changing it immediately. Since Wiki is visited so frequently, there is a slim chance that wrong information will stay posted for a long period of time.
Beckett defines Media Literacy as "the ability to access, understand, and create communications in a variety of contexts" (157). He believes the audience needs to invest time and effort in Networked Journalism, and they can do this by investing in media literacy. Because we are entering a world of citizen journalism, citizens themselves must be accurate, fair, and honest. Journalists (citizen or not) must also understand the new technologies and platforms associated with Networked Media. According to Beckett, because of this joint understanding, we can "close the distance between people on a global scale" (166). If we enable viewers to be a part of the media process, we are bringing them into connectivity, and this is what Beckett believes is the most important principle of Networked Journalism.
Questions:
1. According to Beckett, Editorial Diversity and Media Literacy are the two biggest factors that need to be improved in order to save journalism. Do you believe this statement is true? If so, why? If not, what do you think is more important?
2. Beckett says, "Networked Journalists need to be better journalists than ever, because they are working with people who think they know better- the public" (147). How do you feel about this comment? Why do you think this affects Networked Journalism more than print or broadcast journalism?
3. Since the world of Networked Journalism is fast approaching, how is the older generation going to get their news when some can't even turn on a computer?
4. To what extent will this period of uncertainty affect other modes of communication (ie. radio and television)? For example, will broadcast journalism remain stable for awhile but print journalism fail altogether? Who is most threatened in your opinion?
Your question about how an older generation will get their news when the world of networked journalism is fast approaching really interests me. It made me think about how quickly this is all happening and whether or not it will feel like the switch has happened in the blink of an eye. So how fast is Networked Journalism going to take over? And when it does will it make newspapers obsolete?
ReplyDeleteI don't think it will, I think that a part of SuperMedia is the combination of both old mainstream news ideas and new media coming together to create something that takes the best from both ideas.
Personally, I think that mainstream news as we know it will change, but that it will gradually morph into something new rather than be completely wiped out like the dinosaurs.